<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for spraker.tv blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spraker.tv/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spraker.tv/blog</link>
	<description>&#34;this one goes to 11&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 07:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video by More from the Spraker Archives: Doppler 8000, Portland Trailblazers and ESPN&#8217;s Colin Cowherd &#171; spraker.tv blog</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?page_id=78&#038;cpage=1#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>More from the Spraker Archives: Doppler 8000, Portland Trailblazers and ESPN&#8217;s Colin Cowherd &#171; spraker.tv blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 07:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?page_id=78#comment-503</guid>
		<description>[...] Video &#8211; Updated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Video &#8211; Updated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pac-10 firms up ESPN/Fox deal by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=607&#038;cpage=1#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=607#comment-485</guid>
		<description>More Info, but not about Northwest distribution.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2011/05/04/pac-12-football-and-basketball-details-on-the-new-tv-deal/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Info, but not about Northwest distribution.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2011/05/04/pac-12-football-and-basketball-details-on-the-new-tv-deal/?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2011/05/04/pac-12-football-and-basketball-details-on-the-new-tv-deal/?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ESPN not only broadcasts in 3D, they study how people watch it by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=449&#038;cpage=1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=449#comment-291</guid>
		<description>http://www.twice.com/article/460068-ViewSonic_Adds_3D_Camcorder_Frame.php

Viewsonic now has pocket 3D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.twice.com/article/460068-ViewSonic_Adds_3D_Camcorder_Frame.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.twice.com/article/460068-ViewSonic_Adds_3D_Camcorder_Frame.php</a></p>
<p>Viewsonic now has pocket 3D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Scenes of ESPN 3D&#8217;s coverage of the Ducks vs. UCLA by Joshua Echo-Hawk</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=352&#038;cpage=1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Echo-Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=352#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Nice post, man.....it was cool to see, eh?  I&#039;m not totally on board either.  I bet it comes our way sooner than later, though.  Then we&#039;ll make fun of when we had to use backpacks for the handheld!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, man&#8230;..it was cool to see, eh?  I&#8217;m not totally on board either.  I bet it comes our way sooner than later, though.  Then we&#8217;ll make fun of when we had to use backpacks for the handheld!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Has the slow development of FCP damaged the industry? by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=319&#038;cpage=1#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=319#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Will CS5 and MC5 toast FCP? 

A post from Oliver Peters...

http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/will-cs5-and-mc5-toast-fcp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will CS5 and MC5 toast FCP? </p>
<p>A post from Oliver Peters&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/will-cs5-and-mc5-toast-fcp/" rel="nofollow">http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/will-cs5-and-mc5-toast-fcp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple rumored to target Final Cut Studio to consumers by Glory</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185&#038;cpage=1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Glory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Therefore, I imagine a new product with YUV rather than RGB internals, that can handle both interlaced and progressive video, that can handle native H.264 editing along with ProRes 422, and can deal with all frame-rates. Obviously, features such as full audio control and audio FX are needed. And, there needs to be a way of nicely handling big projects. (Maybe a Timeline mode will need to be added.)  Integrate Garage Band music composition features and revised iWeb functions, and you have a tool to support Apple&#039;s entire mobile strategy. In fact, it also supports the major growing markets: corporate, education, government, worship, and indie narrative and docs. (Who knows, even a version of iDVD that burns BD.) This product hits the sweet-spot for Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Therefore, I imagine a new product with YUV rather than RGB internals, that can handle both interlaced and progressive video, that can handle native H.264 editing along with ProRes 422, and can deal with all frame-rates. Obviously, features such as full audio control and audio FX are needed. And, there needs to be a way of nicely handling big projects. (Maybe a Timeline mode will need to be added.)  Integrate Garage Band music composition features and revised iWeb functions, and you have a tool to support Apple&#8217;s entire mobile strategy. In fact, it also supports the major growing markets: corporate, education, government, worship, and indie narrative and docs. (Who knows, even a version of iDVD that burns BD.) This product hits the sweet-spot for Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple rumored to target Final Cut Studio to consumers by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185&#038;cpage=1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Just to follow up, Apple made the very rare move to respond to all the buzz surrounding this rumor.  According to CNet:

&quot;Apple on Wednesday denied published reports that its professional-level suite of video software applications is being refocused to suit more mainstream customers. &quot;   See http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20005409-37.html

Not everyone is convinced.  See:

http://www.flickgym.com/2010/05/apple-tries-to-save-face-with-its-user-base-and-a-rant-about-final-cut-prosumer.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to follow up, Apple made the very rare move to respond to all the buzz surrounding this rumor.  According to CNet:</p>
<p>&#8220;Apple on Wednesday denied published reports that its professional-level suite of video software applications is being refocused to suit more mainstream customers. &#8221;   See <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20005409-37.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20005409-37.html</a></p>
<p>Not everyone is convinced.  See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickgym.com/2010/05/apple-tries-to-save-face-with-its-user-base-and-a-rant-about-final-cut-prosumer.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickgym.com/2010/05/apple-tries-to-save-face-with-its-user-base-and-a-rant-about-final-cut-prosumer.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple rumored to target Final Cut Studio to consumers by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=185#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Lively discussion on the Avid-L2.  

http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/message/80611

Here&#039;s one example from Steve Mullen:

Philip is likely spot on, but were I at Apple I would be thinking:

1) We no longer need ProApps to sell our hot hardware. Those days are 
over. The fact is customers want our hardware and OS. Pros will buy 
our hardware even if we sold nothing more than it.

2) Despite pissing off Adobe over Flash, it was really a simple kick 
in the butt to get them to support html 5 and h264. We want them to 
get WITH our strategy.

3) Most creatives use Adobe CS. Premiere has been the weak point. But, 
let&#039;s face-it, Premiere with CUDA blows our current offerings away and 
helps sell our hardware.

4) Avid has finally got their act together. And, MC 5 is perfect for 
our high-end MBP, iMac, and MPs. So it too sells our hardware. Just as 
does Office.

5) Bottom-line, there are two companies who are willing to spend to 
support the &quot;pro&quot; editing market. Do we need to spend the money to 
keep-up with them?

6) NO. It will cost a ton of money to update a version of FCS to use 
all the functions in our new OS. It will cost even more money to fix 
all the bugs in data management and the bugs we&#039;ve been ignoring for 
years. So we will spend lots of money and time and will then have to 
face improved Adobe and Avid products.

7) NO. Where is the most media editing being done? Not Hollywood and 
NYC. Let Avid have this VERY niche market! EVERYONE is editing media 
today. Therefore, we need to focus on the 2010 and beyond media 
market. But, what about Adobe? Not to worry! CS5 is overly complex 
internally and externally. It is too hard to learn and too expensive. 
Let Adobe fight with Avid.

8) NO. Nothing in FCS. MC, and CS5 really show-off &quot;Apple 2012.&quot; Apple 
doesn&#039;t do what others do! We only do revolutionary products -- and a 
re-worked FCS isn&#039;t revolutionary. (Meaning a product that demos well.)

9) When Apple does a product it must be revolutionary, hit the middle 
(read largest) segment of the market, and support our mobile strategy. 
Which is iWork, iLife, iWeb, and MobielMe do. Just as we don&#039;t build a 
copy of Office -- we should not -- in 2012 -- build a copy of CS5 or MC.

10) Although iLife&#039;s problem is no longer its lack of iMovie 06&#039;s FX 
-- it has huge problems working with interlaced video. It also can&#039;t 
do the level of projects than can be done with FCE. But, it has been a 
wonderful lab experiment. Randy designed it and I&#039;m sure he must have 
read the thousands upon thousands of posts screaming about it&#039;s lack 
of quality video exports and it&#039;s terrible reliability -- especially 
with 10.6. I doubt he will simply alter iMovie 09. He will start over.

11) Although, it&#039;s not hard to imagine an iPad version.

12) Therefore,I imagine a new product with YUV rather than RGB 
internals, that can handle both interlaced and progressive video, that 
can handle native H.264 editing along with ProRes 422, and can deal 
with all frame-rates. Obviously, features such as full audio control 
and audio FX are needed. And, there needs to be a way of nicely 
handling big projects. (Maybe a Timeline mode will need to be added.) 
Integrate GarageBand music composition features and revised iWeb 
functions, and you have a tool to support Apple&#039;s entire mobile 
strategy. In fact, it also supports the major growing markets: 
corporate, education, government, worship, and indie narrative and 
docs. (Who knows, even a version of iDVD that burns BD.) This product 
hits the sweet-spot for Apple.

Steve Mullen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lively discussion on the Avid-L2.  </p>
<p><a href="http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/message/80611" rel="nofollow">http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/message/80611</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one example from Steve Mullen:</p>
<p>Philip is likely spot on, but were I at Apple I would be thinking:</p>
<p>1) We no longer need ProApps to sell our hot hardware. Those days are<br />
over. The fact is customers want our hardware and OS. Pros will buy<br />
our hardware even if we sold nothing more than it.</p>
<p>2) Despite pissing off Adobe over Flash, it was really a simple kick<br />
in the butt to get them to support html 5 and h264. We want them to<br />
get WITH our strategy.</p>
<p>3) Most creatives use Adobe CS. Premiere has been the weak point. But,<br />
let&#8217;s face-it, Premiere with CUDA blows our current offerings away and<br />
helps sell our hardware.</p>
<p>4) Avid has finally got their act together. And, MC 5 is perfect for<br />
our high-end MBP, iMac, and MPs. So it too sells our hardware. Just as<br />
does Office.</p>
<p>5) Bottom-line, there are two companies who are willing to spend to<br />
support the &#8220;pro&#8221; editing market. Do we need to spend the money to<br />
keep-up with them?</p>
<p>6) NO. It will cost a ton of money to update a version of FCS to use<br />
all the functions in our new OS. It will cost even more money to fix<br />
all the bugs in data management and the bugs we&#8217;ve been ignoring for<br />
years. So we will spend lots of money and time and will then have to<br />
face improved Adobe and Avid products.</p>
<p>7) NO. Where is the most media editing being done? Not Hollywood and<br />
NYC. Let Avid have this VERY niche market! EVERYONE is editing media<br />
today. Therefore, we need to focus on the 2010 and beyond media<br />
market. But, what about Adobe? Not to worry! CS5 is overly complex<br />
internally and externally. It is too hard to learn and too expensive.<br />
Let Adobe fight with Avid.</p>
<p> <img src='http://spraker.tv/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> NO. Nothing in FCS. MC, and CS5 really show-off &#8220;Apple 2012.&#8221; Apple<br />
doesn&#8217;t do what others do! We only do revolutionary products &#8212; and a<br />
re-worked FCS isn&#8217;t revolutionary. (Meaning a product that demos well.)</p>
<p>9) When Apple does a product it must be revolutionary, hit the middle<br />
(read largest) segment of the market, and support our mobile strategy.<br />
Which is iWork, iLife, iWeb, and MobielMe do. Just as we don&#8217;t build a<br />
copy of Office &#8212; we should not &#8212; in 2012 &#8212; build a copy of CS5 or MC.</p>
<p>10) Although iLife&#8217;s problem is no longer its lack of iMovie 06&#8242;s FX<br />
&#8211; it has huge problems working with interlaced video. It also can&#8217;t<br />
do the level of projects than can be done with FCE. But, it has been a<br />
wonderful lab experiment. Randy designed it and I&#8217;m sure he must have<br />
read the thousands upon thousands of posts screaming about it&#8217;s lack<br />
of quality video exports and it&#8217;s terrible reliability &#8212; especially<br />
with 10.6. I doubt he will simply alter iMovie 09. He will start over.</p>
<p>11) Although, it&#8217;s not hard to imagine an iPad version.</p>
<p>12) Therefore,I imagine a new product with YUV rather than RGB<br />
internals, that can handle both interlaced and progressive video, that<br />
can handle native H.264 editing along with ProRes 422, and can deal<br />
with all frame-rates. Obviously, features such as full audio control<br />
and audio FX are needed. And, there needs to be a way of nicely<br />
handling big projects. (Maybe a Timeline mode will need to be added.)<br />
Integrate GarageBand music composition features and revised iWeb<br />
functions, and you have a tool to support Apple&#8217;s entire mobile<br />
strategy. In fact, it also supports the major growing markets:<br />
corporate, education, government, worship, and indie narrative and<br />
docs. (Who knows, even a version of iDVD that burns BD.) This product<br />
hits the sweet-spot for Apple.</p>
<p>Steve Mullen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJA party was the place to be @ NAB by dave</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=124&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=124#comment-10</guid>
		<description>That is not me in the picture (although I did take a turn on the dance floor).  Since it&#039;s impossible to get a good beer in Vegas, I switched to Run &amp; Coke.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not me in the picture (although I did take a turn on the dance floor).  Since it&#8217;s impossible to get a good beer in Vegas, I switched to Run &#038; Coke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJA party was the place to be @ NAB by Willy</title>
		<link>http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=124&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spraker.tv/blog/?p=124#comment-9</guid>
		<description>What are you drinking!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you drinking!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

